An Enterprise Architect’s Practical Guide to Leading Agentic AI Frameworks in 2025
- Mike J. Walker
- Sep 28, 2024
- 3 min read
Updated: Apr 30
Over the past 18 months we have watched generative AI sprint from novel text generation to orchestrating sophisticated, end-to-end business processes. The inflection point is the rise of agentic frameworks—toolkits that let large-language-model (LLM)–powered “agents” perceive context, plan, decide, and act with minimal human supervision. In other words, we are moving from content creation to capability execution.
Before we go too deep on Agentic Frameworks, it's important for us to understand that while this form of AI has gotten quite a bit of press, this isn't new. Take a look at the 2016 Gartner research note "Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2016: Autonomous Agents and things".

From an enterprise-architecture (EA) perspective, agentic AI represents a new integration layer that sits above micro-services and below the employee experience. It demands the same rigor we apply to any mission-critical platform: clear capabilities, reference architectures, governance guardrails, and a road-map for continuous improvement.
What “Agentic” Really Means
Autonomy with Accountability. Agents can pursue goals independently, but they must expose observability hooks (telemetry, lineage, cost) so architects can assure compliance.
Tool-Centric Reasoning. Unlike a standalone LLM, an agent binds reasoning steps to external tools—APIs, RPA bots, SAP transactions, Python code—closing the gap between insight and outcome.
Memory & Long-Horizon Planning. Enterprise scenarios (batch release in pharma, quarter-close in finance) span hours to weeks. Durable memory stores—vector DBs or knowledge graphs—become first-class components.
Multi-Agent Collaboration. Complex value chains require swarms of specialists cooperating via explicit protocols and role contracts, much like micro-services in a service mesh.
Architectural Must-Haves
Capability | Why It Matters | EA Watch-Points |
Policy-Aware Orchestration | Fine-grained control of which actions, tools, or data an agent can access | Embed RBAC and data-sensitivity labels at the framework layer |
Observability & Cost Telemetry | Prevent “run-away agents” that burn tokens or violate SLAs | Standardize on OpenTelemetry† and tag every span with user, prompt, and tool IDs |
Governance Hooks | Audit, lineage, kill-switches | Wire agent events into your existing GRC stack |
CI/CD for Prompts & Agents | Versioned prompts, unit tests, blue/green deployment | Treat prompts as code; integrate with GitHub Actions and automated eval harnesses |
Human-in-the-Loop Escalation | Safety-critical checkpoints for high-impact moves (e.g., SAP postings) | Policy engine should route to SMEs based on risk tier |
My rule of thumb: if your framework can’t answer “who prompted what, when, with which tool, at what cost, and why?”—it’s not ready for enterprise scale.
Agentic AI High-Level Architectural Layers

The 2025 Framework Landscape
Below is a pragmatic snapshot of leading agentic frameworks through an EA lens. I’ve omitted marketing fluff and focused on differentiators that matter in production:
Framework | Core Strength | Ideal Use Cases | Maturity Signal |
Microsoft AutoGen | Conversation-centric multi-agent runtime with built-in tool calling and reflection loops | RAG pipelines, software-dev agents, regulated-industry PoCs | v0.4+, active MSR support, converging with Semantic Kernel |
Semantic Kernel (Agent Framework) | Enterprise-grade SDK with DI “kernel”, skills registry, and native Azure compliance | Governance-heavy workloads, human-in-loop orchestration | GA 1.x, commercial support via Microsoft Learn & Partner ecosystem |
LangChain & LangGraph | Swiss-army-knife abstractions; LangGraph enables state-machine-like agent flows | Fast prototyping, research, data-heavy chaining | Huge OSS community, commercial LangSmith observability |
CrewAI | Role-based multi-agent crews with explicit task contracts | Market research, analytical workflows, doc processing | Active OSS, simple mental model |
Hugging Face Transformers Agents 2.0 | Tight integration with HF model zoo and secure code execution sandbox | High-performance inference, vision-&-text pipelines | Part of HF ecosystem; CUDA-heavy demos |
MetaGPT | SOP-driven “virtual dev team” generator | Software engineering automation, code generation | Rapidly evolving; watch licence for commercial work |
NANDA (MIT) | Decentralized “Internet of Agents” infrastructure—registries, trace, trust | Cross-org data sharing, edge-AI networks | Research preview; track MCP standards traction |
Flowise | Low-code drag-and-drop builder for LLM pipelines | Citizen-dev PoCs, departmental apps | Good for demos; wrap with SK or AutoGen for prod |
The Road Ahead
The leading frameworks are already converging—AutoGen’s runtime is aligning with Semantic Kernel, LangGraph borrows orchestration patterns from process engines, and open protocols like MCP suggest an interop layer on the horizon.
My advice:
Invest in two stacks: one experimentation stack (LangChain/LangGraph) for speed, one production stack (Semantic Kernel + AutoGen) for governance.
Elevate agentic capability into your enterprise architecture metamodel. Treat “agent orchestration” as a platform domain alongside API gateways and event meshes.
Champion standards. Join MCP or OSS SIGs; influence guardrails rather than retrofit them.
Agentic AI is no longer a research toy—it is a strategic enabler. With disciplined architecture and the right framework choices, we can turn autonomous reasoning into measurable business value.
Comments