Defining Business Architecture
- Mike J. Walker
- Sep 30, 2013
- 8 min read
Updated: 3 days ago
When we talk about enterprise architecture (EA), the conversation often drifts to technologies—cloud platforms, data models, and application services. However, at the heart of EA sits business architecture (BA), the discipline that ensures every IT initiative flows directly from business strategy, capability needs, and desired outcomes.
In this piece, we’ll clarify what BA is, why it matters, and how to make it work effectively—complete with real-world perspectives, integration points, and measurable success criteria.
The Essence of Business Architecture
Business architecture is the “north star” that keeps enterprise architecture relevant to the actual business. Rather than focusing on servers or coding frameworks, BA asks questions like:
Which capabilities does the business need to excel in its market?
How do we model our organization’s value streams and processes to deliver on strategy?
Where are the pain points or inefficiencies that hamper scalability or innovation?
Why Business Architecture Matters
Strategic Alignment: BA acts as a bridge between executive vision and day-to-day operations. When done well, it translates high-level goals (e.g., “expand into new markets”) into actionable capability roadmaps and process changes.
Holistic View of Change: Because BA spans business units, it spots cross-functional dependencies early—avoiding “random acts of IT” or siloed improvements that hamper synergy.
Focus on Value Streams: By looking at how value is delivered to customers, employees, or partners, BA helps isolate inefficiencies and highlight opportunities for differentiation—whether in speed, cost, or customer experience.
Defining Business Architecture
The definition I have been using for some time now with customers is the following:
A formal method and a set of descriptions that distills the business environment and the needs of a business into set of models representing business information, concepts, value, and risk that are expressed through an architectural view of a business.
With this definition I wanted to be inclusive of all aspects of business architecture. I found most descriptions or definitions are too narrow or prescribe a particular outcome. I believe that business architecture is a means to an end not the entire solution all unto itself. Business Architecture is a critical part of Enterprise Architecture, ensuring all of the EA oriented in a way to maximize value.As you may of noticed, I have highlighted certain words. For the rest of this post I will go through the highlighted words in the definition in an attempt to explain each on independently to show how they relate and describe Business Architecture.
So let's start decomposing the definition.
#1. Operates within Enterprise Architecture
While not stated in the actual definition, it is implied that business architecture is a domain within Enterprise Architecture.
Business Architecture on it’s own only provides a subset of a complete solution. For example, only understanding a business model doesn’t get your stakeholders any closer to defining a solution to a problem or opportunity. It’s when you bring in the macro level EA methods combined with the other domains of architecture where you really see the power behind business architecture.
From an industry perspective, there is a tendency to try to make business architecture an independent framework.
This approach is very dangerous.
There are many motivations for this, some I believe are the right motivations but the implementation in my honest opinion are very wrong. I think so of this stems from a misunderstanding of the intent of Enterprise Architecture. The challenge comes in when we mix the current state environment in which some organization implement EA or lack there of and the definition of EA from the EA standards community. As an example, I was digging through my personal archives of content and found a TOGAF 7.0 overview deck from the Open Group. I was surprise to see, even then a business outcome focus from the EA community. Note however, there was not a whole lot of guidance around this until 9.0 but the intent and direction was clearly stated from the very early days of the TOGAF standard.
Methods are techniques that weave through the various contexts using proven methods… Methods should also describe the how-to of execution while enabling further integration into an Enterprise Architecture (EA) context method.
I believe that Business Architecture isn’t a deliverable but rather a discipline within Enterprise Architecture that has a set of methods, roles and artifacts that serve to solve a very specific part of a problem. Arguably the most important aspect, the context into why we are doing an activity along with ensuring what is delivered ultimately provides the most benefit back to the company. The challenge I have with some interpretations of Business Architecture is that it is either implied or explicitly defined that a specific artifact is the results of Business Architecture. The OMG definition is a good example of this with stating, ”blueprint of the enterprise”. The problem with this is that this is really meaningless with out some purpose. To what end does this blueprint serve. You could also replace that with business capability model and have the same questions. What I sometimes find and advise against to my clients, EA’s should not pivot there work off a specific artifact or deliverable. Focus on the outcome you wish to achieve and work through a proven method to generate a consistent result solving that problem. Without a method you will find yourself generating artifacts for artifact sake, while sometimes we get lucky, we know that hasn’t yielded effective results.
#3 Distilling a Business
Often times you see Business Architecture defined as taking in strategy and doing something with it. While I think this is certainly one use case but I don’t think it is the only one.
The reason for simply saying “needs of the business” is to be purposefully that broad. It shouldn’t matter what comes into the Enterprise Architecture process, all of it should be understood from a business perspective. Even if that thing is a great new technology trend like wearable technologies. We would still want to understand the business implications and opportunities such as the external forces that impact a business that they do not have control of.
Distilling these conditions requires many different disiplines that could include:
Strategic planning
Major business transformation activities
M&A support
Value management
Creating architectures that support initiatives or programs
Managing the Enterprise Portfolio
Change Management
#4 Business Information
Identifies the business information entities required to enable a business architecture
References an enterprise data model for a clear definition of what business terms mean such as customer or product.
Classifies information into segments for better understanding and usage within a solution
Provides facts on market place.
Prescribes a large part of a business process by defining the information in which it is facilitation the flow of.
#5 Business concepts
The term used here is another broad but purposely broad term. It is meant to encompass all the business concepts we want to articulate for our business architecture. There are quite a few of them so the rational for using business concepts rather than naming 20 different business “things” was to not be prescriptive. Also I am sure there would be some left as well. So here we want to identify a category of business oriented concepts that would involve modeling all the different aspects of a business. This could include but limited to the following:
Customers
Products
Entitlements
Goods and Services
Competition
Drivers, forces or motivations
External relationships
Capabilities and processes
By examining these aspects along with their relationships we can understand the needs of a business better along with creating a model for realizing value.
#6 Business Value Driven
Enterprise Architecture is a methodology that is business value driven. Business Architecture as a key domain within it inherits this position as well. An outcome of this and any architectural process should be defined and a model for maximizing value for a business. Business Architecture is square in the middle of taking a business case that was (or wasn’t) defined and ensuring it can be quantified and qualified.
In Business Architecture we identify, define and quantify value that will serve as the basis for all other architectural work.
Through leveraging value and benefits management techniques we can properly. This is much like a traditional financial analysis that would include the valuation of existing investments and the forecasting of new opportunities. Through this process it’s important to use models that either resonate with your business or are common in the financial industry.
Examples of Value Models
Business Capabilities
A “capability” is what the organization does—think “Marketing Analytics,” “Logistics Tracking,” or “Partner Onboarding.”
Mapping capabilities clarifies where strengths or gaps lie and helps prioritize investments.
Value Streams
A value stream outlines how value is delivered end-to-end (e.g., from customer inquiry to post-sales support).
Understanding these streams reveals pain points (long cycle times, manual steps) and potential process automations that can be enabled by technology.
Organization & Operating Models
BA examines roles, business units, and governance structures to ensure the org design supports strategic aims.
This might lead to redefining cross-department relationships or introducing new centers of excellence.
Information & Stakeholder Views
BA often identifies who needs what information to fulfill capabilities effectively. For instance, if “Product Innovation” is a core capability, do R&D teams have the necessary market intelligence?
Stakeholder maps help track who’s impacted by changes and ensure alignment.
Those models will help you understand a broader value picture. Additional models that can be used as inputs into these are:
Risk Adjusted Value (RAV)
Net Present Value (NPV)
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Return on Investment (ROI)
Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)
Benefit Dependency Network (BDN)
Value System
Value Network
Business Architecture not only models value but also determines how value can be maximized. This is one of the benefits that Enterprise Architecture can deliver. It can identify new opportunities not seen before by business stakeholders.
#7 Business Risk
We just looked at value and understanding benefits but there was one aspect not covered within it, risk. Understanding value has two facets, benefit and risk. Understanding risk within Business Architecture allows us to do the following:
Take a business centric approach to understanding threats
Identify potential harmful risks to the company
Classify business information in an informed way
Qualify or disqualify potential solutions
Understand risk the risk tolerance of the corporation or a specific business unit
Examine readiness factors such as organizational and technical readiness.
Through the usage of risk management techniques within Business Architecture we will be able to identify, assess, and prioritize business risk to ensure that risk is well understood and managed throughout the architecting process. Through this quantification we should use standard risk methods such as:
Risk assessments using a composite risk index
Risk options matrix
Risk mitigation plan
#8 An architectural view of the business
This aspect of the definition addresses another key debate in the industry. It is perhaps the most important mental framing concepts of the definition. I often hear Business Architecture described in one of two ways.
Business Architecture creates business strategy
Business Architecture is a method in which Enterprise Architects can rationalize the needs of a business so that it can be executed upon. Based on the rest of this post you can see where we are going here. In my definition of Business Architecture we are looking at a business need through the lens of an architect. This means that we create models that we can use through the architecting process. They are not:
In 100% business only language entirely describing business planning or strategy activities as performed by a business planner or corporate strategy.
With this said, Business Architecture should be presentable to business unit leaders (as with most architecture artifacts) which the artifacts and models created should lend from the business world primarily but not at the expense of architecting.
Final Thoughts
Defining business architecture goes beyond creating fancy diagrams. It’s about clarifying how the entire organization works together to deliver value—aligning strategic ambitions with the capabilities and processes that make them real.
Unifying Strategy & Execution: BA ensures that strategic decisions aren’t just lofty goals but grounded in feasible operational improvements.
Driving Continuous Improvement: Because BA fosters a macro view of how value flows, it naturally highlights areas for iterative enhancements.
Forging a Cross-Disciplinary Culture: By tying business priorities to architecture decisions, BA helps break silos, forging a culture where technology and business teams see themselves as partners in innovation.
Done well, BA underpins every successful digital transformation, ensuring each new app, integration, or system is more than an IT project—it’s a step toward a holistically aligned, agile, and value-focused enterprise.
Comments